The hostility I see from the more right-leaning libertarians towards Obama is bewildering. I can understand that you disagree with virtually all of his positions – so do I – but there are two things to consider here:

1. Republicans lie. They don’t care about small government. It’s time to face the facts and realize that Reagan was both an anomaly and not as libertarian as the paleolibs who eulogize him today claim. Despite the rhetoric, we’ve been let down by every single Republican presidential nominee since Goldwater. John McCain stands for the continuation of virtually every unlibertarian policy Bush has pushed forward in the last 8 years. The fact that anyone who claims to be a libertarian could even consider voting for him is astonishing.

2. Libertarians need to examine this country and determine what the biggest threats to liberty in America are right now. The biggest theat to liberty is clearly the War on Terrorism. The second biggest threat is the War on Drugs. McCain and the Republicans stand for an even further increase in efforts towards both.

Obama isn’t perfect, but he’ll do better on those two massive issues than any Republican besides Ron Paul would. Libertarians need to stop pretending that if we lower taxes enough everything else will turn out okay. It’s becoming increasingly clear that economic freedom will not lead to social freedom, in the country and in the Republican party – the most economically free states are frequently the most socially oppressive. On the other hand, it seems much more likely to me that modern liberals could be swayed towards the free market, once the realities of economics become apparent to them.

Thus I suggest that the Democratic Party is a more natural ally for libertarians right now than the Republican Party, barring some sort of massive sea change within their ranks. Let the paleolibertarians do what they want; they are more concerned with fantasizing about some ideal conservative libertarian society than actually promoting freedom the best they can. It seems clear to me that an America under Barack Obama or perhaps even Hillary Clinton will be far more free than an America under John McCain.

I will elaborate on my own theory of libertarianism later, because I’d wager that I differ from most on one key point. But I’ll save that for another day…

3 Comments

  1. Obama is anti Second Amendment.
    Obama thinks he can talk our way out of terrorism.
    Has Obama seen a tax that he didn’t like?
    Obama attends a racist church.

    This Conservative Libertarian refuses to vote for anyone like that.

  2. McCain is anti 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 14th amendments. He was part of the giant savings and loan scandals of the ’80s. Look up the Keating five. He supports torture and warrantless wiretapping. He supports illegal war. McCain is pro war on drugs and pro war on america (war on terror). He is currently violating McCain-Feingold. He is anti-science and promises to appoint judges like Alito and Roberts. There will be no liberty left after that.

  3. McCain is also very anti second if you take the time to chech his record.

    What torture does he support? Water boarding is a mind trick, not torture.

    Illegal war..? Saddam violated treaty’s at least seventeen times. Even the International Court is not going after us on this issue.

    Tom Tancredo for President :)


One Trackback/Pingback

  1. [...] we get a libertarian for Obama? « Bricks Can we get a libertarian for Obama? « Bricks Obama is anti Second Amendment. Obama thinks he can talk our way out of terrorism. Has Obama seen a [...]

Post a Comment

*
*